To apply the apache license to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets replaced with your own identifying information. Jetty web container copyright 19952012 mort bay consulting pty ltd. Why corporations favors the apache license over the gpllgpl. However, this is not the primary motivation for me. Licensed works, modifications, and larger works may be distributed under different terms and without source code. To get help on using pdfbox, please subscribe to the users mailing list and post. The information i gathered up to this point is a bit confusing, but it looks like a simple and proper way to comply is to have an about section in the app or something like that and cite some details for each library that was used name and author mostly and provide links to. To inspect the license terms please consult the license and notice files in. Apache adherents believe that software can be free and is perhaps best when free.
The common understanding while i was working on apache code a while back was that you could incorporate bsd, mit, and similar licensed libraries but you could not do the same for gpl based licenses. Apache mit licensed libraries in a closedsource app. Compare these products for pdf generation with java given. The apache pdfbox library is an open source java tool for working with pdf documents. Does not prevent others from taking and selling your software. Coderay is written by you, i have to claim it to the legal guys. As a permissive license, it puts only very limited restriction on reuse and has, therefore, high license compatibility it is compatible because it. Gnu general public license gpl gnu affero public license agpl. The mit license is a permissive free software license originating at the massachusetts institute of technology mit in the late 1980s. We also recommend that a file or class name and description. Tldrlegal provides generally good summaries of licenses. Apache, unfortunately, isnt compatible with gpl v2. Lgpl license is incompatible with apache license issue. So in the apache faq the asf references their own software.
Not all the libraries using the apache license are from the apache software foundation asf. Under the gpl, you must always provide the source code. Pdfsharp and migradoc foundation are published under the mit license. Facebook recently relicensed its open source projects react, jest, flow, and immutable.
I read that i should add them in my file, but the thing is my project is a site constituting of php files, is there a certain file that i. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense. View in hierarchy view source export to pdf export to word. The apache software license was based in large part on bsd and mit style licenses. The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. It would be great if duallicense it under apache license or mit. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses wikipedia. The gnulgpl is very popular among independent developers and companies which mainly deals with open source software. Mit license a short and simple permissive license with conditions only requiring preservation of and license notices.
Apache pdfbox is published under the apache license v2. The mit license is permissive enough that anyone can take your code, rebrand it and sell it. The unlicense vs mit license detailed comparison as of. Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the open source definition in brief, they allow software to be freely used, modified, and shared. I never used a library that i needed to include the license before, so i have no idea where to add them. This is harmful to user freedom because it lets future development be taken out of the public domain and instead moved into nonfree programs. If youre looking for a reference table of every license on. Add advanced pdf capability to your java or android applications. Unlike the apache license, the gpl embeds the decision as to the codes open source nature into the code itself. Requirements for using an apachelicensed library open. I found many ruby gem are licensed under apache license or mit. Qt contains some code that is not provided under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl or the qt commercial license, but rather under specific licenses from the original authors the qt company gratefully acknowledges these and other contributions to qt.
If you have some code you are thinking of releasing under an open source license, and you want a quick overview of the broadstrokes differences between these licenses, you have come to the right place. Do apachelicensed libraries also count as apache softwares. Apache license spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance category. Library open source license best practice library technology. For harvard library created open source projects, the library is motivated to release software under a license that is common in the library community and is as simple. Apache gives huge protections for unforeseen scenarios.
Apache pdfbox also includes several commandline utilities. Runtime library for typescript helper functions latest release 1. A detailed listing of the most popular, recently updated and most watched mit license licensed packages online discover open source libraries, modules and frameworks you can use in your code toggle navigation. Whatever your pdf needs are today or in the future, we have a solution for you. Difference between different types of open sources licenses.
This project allows creation of new pdf documents, manipulation of existing documents and the ability to extract content from documents. Pdfsharp and migradoc foundation are open source and free to use. Mit license vs creative commons detailed comparison as of. Creating pdf documents with apache pdfbox 2 dzone java. We recommend that programs that use qt also acknowledge these contributions, and quote these license statements in an appendix to the. Copyleft licenses are licenses that require redistributed copies and derivative works to be under the same license. The mit expat license doesnt protect against opensource code being taken without payment and used in proprietary software. I have this open source code with mit license that uses an apache 2. Kcp a fast and reliable arq protocol that helps applications to reduce network latency. Notice that the popular licenses featured on the home page gnu gplv3 and mit fall within this spectrum.
If the library has a notice file, then this notice should also be included especially if it was not included in the library. What are the differences between ofl and apache license. Yet, many foss licenses, like the apache license, and all free software licenses. I want to include this in my project, so it can be built right away. The mit license requires reproducing countless copies of the same header with different names in the field, for every mit library in use.
The apache license, on the other hand, is favored by the big corporations for their open source projects. What are the essential differences between the bsd and mit. Templates are written in the freemarker template language ftl, which is a simple, specialized language not a fullblown programming language like php. Copy, modify and integrate the source code of pdfsharp and migradoc foundation in your applications without restrictions at all. Apache pdfbox 2 was released earlier this year and since then, apache pdfbox 2. These class provide a simple way to construct documents and add the contents. To begin with, the apache license was created with computer software in mind, as a freeopen license that requires a softwares source code to be freely available. Most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. All software produced by the apache software foundation or any of its projects or subjects is licensed according to the terms of the documents listed below. Open source java libraries to create pdf documents itext vs apache fop. I am using a library that is under the mit license. This is a comparison of free and opensource software licenses.
1178 1023 1637 905 350 1536 1138 1205 49 889 182 1317 1436 371 1062 672 770 537 1340 947 317 1149 1110 1673 672 892 997 1402 1362 1045 21 815 1167 1431 1238 1332 1328 17 872 1461 1325 1078 1046 127 1132 1143 1293