Pdfsharp and migradoc foundation are open source and free to use. This is a comparison of free and opensource software licenses. Mit license vs creative commons detailed comparison as of. This project allows creation of new pdf documents, manipulation of existing documents and the ability to extract content from documents. The information i gathered up to this point is a bit confusing, but it looks like a simple and proper way to comply is to have an about section in the app or something like that and cite some details for each library that was used name and author mostly and provide links to. Whatever your pdf needs are today or in the future, we have a solution for you. These class provide a simple way to construct documents and add the contents. I am using a library that is under the mit license. What are the essential differences between the bsd and mit.
Runtime library for typescript helper functions latest release 1. Licensed works, modifications, and larger works may be distributed under different terms and without source code. A detailed listing of the most popular, recently updated and most watched mit license licensed packages online discover open source libraries, modules and frameworks you can use in your code toggle navigation. Differences in distribution, linking, modification, private use of open source licenses like mit, gnu gpl, apache 2. Facebook recently relicensed its open source projects react, jest, flow, and immutable.
The unlicense vs mit license detailed comparison as of. The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. To get help on using pdfbox, please subscribe to the users mailing list and post. Apache pdfbox also includes several commandline utilities. As a permissive license, it puts only very limited restriction on reuse and has, therefore, high license compatibility it is compatible because it. The gnulgpl is very popular among independent developers and companies which mainly deals with open source software. In general, software distributed under the mit license, bsd modified license or the apache 2.
Do apachelicensed libraries also count as apache softwares. Does not prevent others from taking and selling your software. Apache license spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance category. If the library has a notice file, then this notice should also be included especially if it was not included in the library. The apache software license was based in large part on bsd and mit style licenses. Creating pdf documents with apache pdfbox 2 dzone java. In other words, the code is free to use, to share and modify but any resultant works must be distributed under the same license. Add advanced pdf capability to your java or android applications. This is harmful to user freedom because it lets future development be taken out of the public domain and instead moved into nonfree programs. The following osiapproved licenses are popular, widely used, or have strong communities. The mit expat license doesnt protect against opensource code being taken without payment and used in proprietary software. To begin with, the apache license was created with computer software in mind, as a freeopen license that requires a softwares source code to be freely available. Copyleft licenses are licenses that require redistributed copies and derivative works to be under the same license.
Pdfsharp and migradoc foundation are published under the mit license. I never used a library that i needed to include the license before, so i have no idea where to add them. The mit license is permissive enough that anyone can take your code, rebrand it and sell it. If you have some code you are thinking of releasing under an open source license, and you want a quick overview of the broadstrokes differences between these licenses, you have come to the right place. We also recommend that a file or class name and description.
The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense. For harvard library created open source projects, the library is motivated to release software under a license that is common in the library community and is as simple. View in hierarchy view source export to pdf export to word. Most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the open source definition in brief, they allow software to be freely used, modified, and shared. Gnu general public license gpl gnu affero public license agpl. License shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, and distribution as defined by sections 1 through 9 of this document. Notice that the popular licenses featured on the home page gnu gplv3 and mit fall within this spectrum. Yet, many foss licenses, like the apache license, and all free software licenses.
Under the gpl, you must always provide the source code. Difference between different types of open sources licenses. Compare these products for pdf generation with java given. The apache license, on the other hand, is favored by the big corporations for their open source projects. Requirements for using an apachelicensed library open. Library open source license best practice library technology. Qt contains some code that is not provided under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl or the qt commercial license, but rather under specific licenses from the original authors the qt company gratefully acknowledges these and other contributions to qt. I want to include this in my project, so it can be built right away. It would be great if duallicense it under apache license or mit. So in the apache faq the asf references their own software. Copy, modify and integrate the source code of pdfsharp and migradoc foundation in your applications without restrictions at all.
Apache mit licensed libraries in a closedsource app. Lgpl license is incompatible with apache license issue. Why corporations favors the apache license over the gpllgpl. Apache pdfbox is published under the apache license v2. The apache pdfbox library is an open source java tool for working with pdf documents. If youre looking for a reference table of every license on.
All software produced by the apache software foundation or any of its projects or subjects is licensed according to the terms of the documents listed below. Apache, unfortunately, isnt compatible with gpl v2. Jetty web container copyright 19952012 mort bay consulting pty ltd. Not all the libraries using the apache license are from the apache software foundation asf. I found many ruby gem are licensed under apache license or mit. To inspect the license terms please consult the license and notice files in.
Kcp a fast and reliable arq protocol that helps applications to reduce network latency. We recommend that programs that use qt also acknowledge these contributions, and quote these license statements in an appendix to the. Coderay is written by you, i have to claim it to the legal guys. Mit license spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance category. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses wikipedia. I have this open source code with mit license that uses an apache 2. Apache gives huge protections for unforeseen scenarios. To apply the apache license to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets replaced with your own identifying information.
Mit license a short and simple permissive license with conditions only requiring preservation of and license notices. Tldrlegal provides generally good summaries of licenses. Unlike the apache license, the gpl embeds the decision as to the codes open source nature into the code itself. Everything you should know about android pdf library. However, this is not the primary motivation for me. Open source java libraries to create pdf documents itext vs apache fop. What are the differences between ofl and apache license. Apache pdfbox 2 was released earlier this year and since then, apache pdfbox 2. The mit license is a permissive free software license originating at the massachusetts institute of technology mit in the late 1980s. I read that i should add them in my file, but the thing is my project is a site constituting of php files, is there a certain file that i. The mit license requires reproducing countless copies of the same header with different names in the field, for every mit library in use. The common understanding while i was working on apache code a while back was that you could incorporate bsd, mit, and similar licensed libraries but you could not do the same for gpl based licenses.
613 732 1325 718 1219 1666 528 623 734 537 587 1189 348 1337 395 1538 106 1630 710 206 868 1442 315 271 1267 860 1023 956 476 542 331 34 973 231 833